> Jamie Brinkoeter wrote:
> > "Cure_Ewan" <karrde_smuggl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:focm9o$5na$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> >>"Aaron" <aaron...@msn.com> wrote in message
> >>news:76114a3f-6939-42d4-bfb2-4da867e0b608@e4g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >>On Feb 5, 6:22 pm, "topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>Good take, and one with which I pretty much agree - especially now
> >>>>when we still have a choice; but as former Democrat, Ronald Reagan
> >>>>stated, "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. It left me."
>
> >>>>With all the "voting for the lesser of two evils" and "holding my nose
> >>>>while I vote" comments I've been hearing, I can see the same thing
> >>>>happening with Pug conservatives.
>
> >>>Not I. I will vote Democrat if McCain is the nominee. I not only have to
> >>>vote against McCain, I have to offset a so-called "moderate conservative"
> >>>vote.
>
> >>Well, your party has left you behind.
>
> >>Why not vote for the "most conservative" of the presidential
> >>candidates? Surely that remains McCain, whether vs. Obama or Clinton?
> >>______________________________
>
> >>Again, the most traditionally Conservative candidate is going to be the
> >>Libertarian candidate. The party has a stance on Iraq that I can't
> >>support unless they intend to stabilize the region by dramatically
> >>weakening Tehran, but other than that I agree with just about everything
> >>they say.
>
> > I can understand "conservative" folks who are unequivocally anti-McCain and
> > won't vote for him under any circumstances voting for a Libertarian. I
> > *cannot* understand voting for Obama or Clinton.
>
> This sums it up nicely.http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/06/roland.martin/index.html- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You're right, Vandar. Martin makes a lot of sense in that editorial.
