> news:gdoiq39jql4h1m8b2k6sd8vsvbhhbig2la@4ax.com...
>>On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:15:11 -0700, "Cure_Ewan"
>><karrde_smuggler_@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jamie Brinkoeter" <jamstew@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:mVcqj.19029$hF2.7940@trnddc02...
>>>
>>>>FWIW, from the WSJ:
>>>>
>>>>Wall Street Journal: McCain And The Supreme Court
>>>>
>>>>By Steven G. Calabresi and John O. McGinnis
>>>>
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>We believe that the nomination of John McCain is the best option to
>>>>preserve the ongoing restoration of constitutional government. He is by
>>>>far the most electable Republican candidate remaining in the race,
>>>
>>>WSJ is dead wrong on this count. They assume that Conservatives have no
>>>principles and will follow blindly what party elites say. They have a
>>>rude
>>>awakening coming in November. McCain was the only candidate in the top
>>>tier
>>>who would guarantee a loss to Clinton or Obama, and who did the electorate
>>>choose? Stupid, stupid move.
>>>
>>
>>That's a narrow, minority opinion, which you stated as fact -- and is
>>far from it. I'm a registered independent who voted for Reagan both
>>terms and Clinton both of his terms --- and I would most likely vote
>>for a McCain ticket this year. There is no way in hell I would vote
>>for Romney. Although I must admit that Huckaby is starting to grow on
>>me. When I get past the fact that he wears his religion on his
>>sleeve, his policies make sense.
>>---
>>
> conservatives. When a large group of people stay home or vote Dem in Nov, as
