On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:15:11 -0700, "Cure_Ewan"
<karrde_smuggler_@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Jamie Brinkoeter" <jamstew@verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:mVcqj.19029$hF2.7940@trnddc02...
>>
>> FWIW, from the WSJ:
>>
>> Wall Street Journal: McCain And The Supreme Court
>>
>> By Steven G. Calabresi and John O. McGinnis
>>
><snip>
>>
>> We believe that the nomination of John McCain is the best option to
>> preserve the ongoing restoration of constitutional government. He is by
>> far the most electable Republican candidate remaining in the race,
>
>WSJ is dead wrong on this count. They assume that Conservatives have no
>principles and will follow blindly what party elites say. They have a rude
>awakening coming in November. McCain was the only candidate in the top tier
>who would guarantee a loss to Clinton or Obama, and who did the electorate
>choose? Stupid, stupid move.
>
That's a narrow, minority opinion, which you stated as fact -- and is
far from it. I'm a registered independent who voted for Reagan both
terms and Clinton both of his terms --- and I would most likely vote
for a McCain ticket this year. There is no way in hell I would vote
for Romney. Although I must admit that Huckaby is starting to grow on
me. When I get past the fact that he wears his religion on his
sleeve, his policies make sense.
---
Zob
