>> "topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in message
>> news:fo4j7f09k4@news4.newsguy.com...
>>
>>>"Bob Rudd" <bobrudd@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:Mccpj.16929$hF2.9934@trnddc02...
>>>
>>>>In article <r6eaq3l9budh32uoamickafs89h8eb0cqn@4ax.com>, zob <zob@
>>>>cox.net> says...
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:48:56 -0800, "fmomoon" <fmomoon@comcast.net>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>We'll see, Bob. Honestly, if Hilary get the nod, I may actually look
>>>>>>at the
>>>>>>McCain/Giuliani combination.
>>>>>
>>>>>TC is going to jump on that as further proof that McCain is a
>>>>>"liberal!" ;-)
>>>>>---
>>>>>Zob
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>TC's soon gonna suggest that anyone who breathes, eats or drinks water
>>>>is a liberal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I haven't "suggested" anything about McCain. I've *provided* proof of his
>>>liberal positions. They are so real, Moni is thinking about voting for
>>>him.
>>>
>>>TC
>>
>>
>> Only if Obama doesn't get the nod. Very much like you are voting against
>> McCain, I would be voting against Clinton. The fact that you would
>> consider voting for Clinton if McCain gets the nod doesn't make you a
>> liberal, you know. McCain is an arch conservative in comparison to
>> Clinton.
>>
>> The difference for me is not that I won't vote for her because of her
>> liberal leanings (that isn't a problem for me) but because I don't like
>> how she talks out of both sides of her mouth. I prefer the idealism and
>> the hope that Obama represents for me. McCain? No, I wouldn't want to
>> vote FOR him, but I will vote AGAINST Clinton.
> you aren't here.
Vandar
fmomoon
